Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 SEPTEMBER 2025

Scope Of Judicial Review Under Article 227 In Section 9 Arbitration Proceedings: A Shield Or A Sword?

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices (formerly Singh & Associates) is a full-services law firm comprising of...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

In a pronouncement that delves into the interplay between Arbitration law and Constitutional writ jurisdiction, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jindal Steel and Power Ltd.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a pronouncement that delves into the interplay between Arbitration law and Constitutional writ jurisdiction, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. and Another v. Bansal Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. and Others, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1041, examined the permissibility of judicial interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against an interim order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act).

Background of the Dispute

The dispute arose from a commercial contract and transaction involving encashment of a Bank Guarantee following termination of a Construction Contract, wherein the Respondent had sought interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from