Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2025

Scope Of Interference Under Section 37 Of The Arbitration Act: Analysing C & C Constructions Ltd. v. IRCON International Ltd.

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices (formerly Singh & Associates) is a full-services law firm comprising of...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in C & C Constructions Ltd. v. IRCON International Ltd. The issue was that ground challenging an arbitral award had not been raised for the first time before the High Court Division Bench under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

I. Introduction

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in C & C Constructions Ltd. v. IRCON International Ltd.1 The issue was that ground challenging an arbitral award had not been raised for the first time before the High Court Division Bench under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act ("Act").

The crux of the dispute between the parties was whether Clause 49.5 of the General Conditions of Contract ("GCC") of their Contract, which prohibited the contractor from claiming damages or compensation for delays attributable to the employer, was enforceable, and whether the Appellant (C & C Constructions Ltd.) could claim damages despite agreeing to extensions of time without penalties.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from