Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2025

Rights Under RERA Cannot Be Ousted By Private Arbitration Clause, Bombay HC Holds

The Bombay High Court, while adjudicating a second appeal in the matter of M/s. Rashmi Realty Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Rahul Rajendrakumar Pagariya and Ors., delivered a seminal ruling that underscores the prominence of statutory forums ...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sourav Sharma
Sourav Sharma
Ashutosh Jadhav
Ashutosh Jadhav
Varsha Aggarwal
Varsha Aggarwal
Harsheen Kaur Luthra
Harsheen Kaur Luthra
Author LinkedIn connections

Introduction

The Bombay High Court (Bombay HC), while adjudicating a second appeal in the matter of M/s. Rashmi Realty Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Rahul Rajendrakumar Pagariya and Ors., delivered a seminal ruling that underscores the prominence of statutory forums over privately negotiated dispute resolution mechanisms in specific legal contexts. The judgment revolved around the jurisdiction of Real Estate Regulatory Authority ("RERA"), established under Section 20 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, vis-à-vis the existence of an arbitration clause encapsulated within an agreement executed between the promoter and the allottees.

The Court, while construing the legislative intent of RERA, unequivocally held that the statutory jurisdiction of RERA is not ousted or rendered nugatory merely by the incorporation of an arbitration clause in the agreement. The doctrine of generalia specialibus non derogant—a general law does not derogate from a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from