In a recent judgment in M/s Laxmi Continental Construction
Co. v. State of U.P. and Anr. the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India held that the mandate of a sole arbitrator who was appointed
by designation could not be terminated solely on ground of their
retirement. In this case, we navigate through the facts and
findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid
judgment.
Brief facts
A contract for certain works was entered into between the
appellant and the respondents vide an agreement dated 6
February 1988 (Agreement). During the contract
work, various disputes arose amongst the parties. The Agreement in
its arbitration clause provided that the disputes shall be resolved
by the government officers of the rank of superintending engineer
or higher, who were not connected with the work under the
Agreement. Accordingly, a sole arbitrator was appointed who was the
Chief Engineer at the relevant point in time. The claimant filed
its claim while the respondents filed