Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2014

High Court v. District Court, Where Will Your Section 34 Arbitration Petition Lie?

Supreme Court considers the meaning of "Court" under Section 2 (1) (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
  • Supreme Court considers the meaning of "Court" under Section 2 (1) (e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • Supreme Court considers where petition will lie when both the contesting petitions are filed on the same day with courts having concurrent jurisdiction.
  • Supreme Court holds that when a Section 34 petition is simultaneously filed in a District court and a High Court the High Court having ordinary original civil side jurisdiction will have primacy to hear the petition.

INTRODUCTION

The Supreme Court ("SC") in its recent judgment of Executive Engineer, Road Development Division No.III, Panvel & Anr. v Atlanta Limited1 has analysed the definition of "Court" to determine which court would hear challenges to an arbitral award (or arbitral agreement, or arbitral proceeding) where jurisdiction lies with more than one court and the parties initiate proceedings in multiple courts simultaneously.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from