In the high stakes domain of international commerce, where
substantial financial interests hinge upon agreements articulated
in tightly, disputes frequently culminate in arbitration for a more
expedient and confidential alternative to cumbersome judicial
proceedings. However, what transpires when the arbiter (the
arbitrator) has previously adjudicated a comparable matter? Can a
prior determination compromise their objectivity? The recent
decision by the Delhi High Court in the case of Steel Authority of
India Limited (SAIL) vs. British Marine PLC1 (October
13, 2025) provides a definitive response: No, not automatically.
This judgment reinforces confidence in the arbitration process by
constricting the criteria for disqualifying arbitrators, ensuring
that specialized knowledge does not become a detriment.
