Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2026

Consent As The Cornerstone Of Arbitration: Analysing Section 7 Through Nagreeka And Glencore

King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Contributor
King, Stubb & Kasiva

King, Stubb & Kasiva

King Stubb & Kasiva is few of the top corporate law firms in India with offices in Bengaluru,...

View firm profile
Explore more from King, Stubb & Kasiva

The validity of an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) ultimately boils down to consent. At its core, an arbitration clause is nothing more than a contractual promise by the parties to resolve their disputes outside the regular court system. But consent isn’t always straightforward.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The validity of an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) ultimately boils down to consent. At its core, an arbitration clause is nothing more than a contractual promise by the parties to resolve their disputes outside the regular court system. But consent isn’t always straightforward. Sometimes parties sign a contract containing a clause that is too weak or tentative to create any real obligation to arbitrate. In other situations, a party may perform extensively under a contract it never signed, leaving the question open whether it is bound by the arbitration clause contained in it. These are two quite different problems, and both come up fairly often in practice.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

https://ksandk.com/

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from