Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JULY 2024

Between The Lines - July 2024

In the matter of United India Insurance Company Limited v. M/s. Hyundai Engineering and Construction Company Limited and Others [Civil Appeal No. 1496 of 2023]...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Supreme Court: Exclusion clauses in insurance contract should be interpreted strictly as they may absolve all the liabilities of the insurer.

⁎ NCLAT: Debt arising out of advance payment for supply of goods or services is an operational debt in terms of Section 5(21) of IBC.

⁎ Telangana High Court: Civil courts have jurisdiction to determine share title, not NCLT/NCLAT.

⁎ Bombay High Court: Mere long-term continuance of employment does not entitle an employee to seek regularization of his services.

I. Supreme Court: Exclusion clauses in insurance contract should be interpreted strictly as they may absolve all the liabilities of the insurer.

In the matter of United India Insurance Company Limited v. M/s. Hyundai Engineering and Construction Company Limited and Others [Civil Appeal No. 1496 of 2023], decided on May 16, 2024, the Division Bench of the Supreme Court reiterated that the insurer has the burden of proving applicability of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

© 2026, Vaish Associates Advocates,
All rights reserved
Advocates, 1st & 11th Floors, Mohan Dev Building 13, Tolstoy Marg New Delhi-110001 (India).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist professional advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. The views expressed in this article are solely of the authors of this article.

See more popular content from