Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2021

Arbitrator Cannot Grant Pendente-Lite Interest When Barred Contractually By Parties: Supreme Court Of India

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

The respondent had floated a tender for construction of boundary wall at its premises in Bawana...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in its recent decision in Garg Builders v. Bharat Heavy Electricals1 held that an arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) was not empowered to award pendente lite interest when the parties had agreed to not have any interests awarded in their contract. In this article, we navigate through the facts and findings in the aforementioned case.

Brief facts

The respondent had floated a tender for construction of boundary wall at its premises in Bawana, Delhi (Project). The appellant submitted its bid for the Project which was accepted by the respondent. The parties entered into a contract in 2009 which, inter alia, contained the interest barring clause. The clause provided that no interest shall be payable by the respondent on, inter alia, any moneys due to the contractor. Disputes arose amongst the parties with respect to the aforesaid contract and subsequently the appellant filed a petition under Section

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from