Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2021

Arbitration Law: Supreme Court Reaffirms Minimal Judicial Interference Under The Arbitration Act, 1940.

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

In an interesting decision , the Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") reaffirmed the principle of judicial non-intervention over arbitral awards...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Background

In an interesting decision1, the Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") reaffirmed the principle of judicial non-intervention over arbitral awards passed even under the Arbitration Act, 1940 ("Act").

Facts

National Thermal Power Corporation Limited ("NTPC") ("Appellant") issued two tenders for construction of certain quarters, which were subsequently awarded to Deconar Services Private Limited ("Deconar").

There was delay in handing over of the construction sites by NTPC, which resultantly delayed completion of both projects. Deconar invoked arbitration and referred the matter to a sole arbitrator. The sole arbitrator subsequently passed two awards dated 7 July 2000 in favor of Deconar ("Awards"). NTPC filed objections against both awards before the Delhi High Court ("High Court") under Sections 30 and 33 of the Act, which were dismissed (except for a modification of the interest rate granted by the sole arbitrator). A division bench of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from