Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2017

A Valid Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust Jurisdiction Of The Consumer Forums In A Builder's Agreement

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi NCR. The firm has 300+...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

In order to protect the customers from the situation arising out of unequal bargaining power, the Legislature has tried to provide an additional remedy under Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In order to protect the customers from the situation arising out of unequal bargaining power, the Legislature has tried to provide an additional remedy under Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act, which states that the provisions of the Act are in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law prevailing for the time being.30

Section 3 of the Consumer's Protection Act (hereinafter referred to as "CP Act") prima facie appears to be in direct conflict with the amended Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "Arbitration Act") which states that in the situations of dispute matters which are arbitrable and the presence of a valid arbitration agreement, the reference to an arbitration is must once invoked by a party. There are many case laws on the issue and the law is well settled that notwithstanding the provisions under Section 8 of the amended Arbitration Act, the arbitration agreements do not bar

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from