Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 MAY 2025

A New Chapter For Section 34: Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited

Argus Partners
Argus Partners
Contributor
Argus Partners

Argus Partners

Argus Partners is a leading Indian law firm with offices in Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Kolkata....

View firm profile
Explore more from Argus Partners

For many years Indian courts adopted a strict view of their powers when reviewing arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation...

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Introduction

For many years Indian courts adopted a strict view of their powers when reviewing arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 ("A&C Act"). Conventionally, judges were able to do only two things: set the award aside or remit it to the arbitral tribunal. In the five judge decision of Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited1 ("Balasamy"), the Supreme Court relaxed such framework. Without abandoning the principle of minimal judicial interference, the Court recognised a limited power to modify an award in clearly defined situations. The judgment therefore marks a significant, but measured, evolution in Indian arbitration law.

The Legal Landscape before Balasamy

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from