Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2021

IP Times.Law Rewind 2020

Singhania & Partners LLP
Explore more from Singhania & Partners LLP

Welcome to the 2020 round up of legal news in the field of Intellectual Property Rights by Singhania & Partners. The newsletter summarizes the latest news and provides a quick overview of judgments and developments.

IndiaIntellectual Property
Bhawna Sharma
Bhawna Sharma
Sana Singh
Sana Singh
Author LinkedIn connections

PATENTS

Denial of Hearing Adjournment Request Results in Remand of the Application back to the Patent Office1

The Intellectual Property Appellate Board ("IPAB") referred back the patent application to the Patent Office for further prosecution and directed to provide fair hearing opportunity to the Applicant, Lifesaver IP Limited.

The Applicant within the legitimate limits, filed request for second adjournment under Rule 129 A of the Patents Rules, 2003 ("Rules") and was expecting the matter likely to be adjourned. The Controller instead of re-scheduling the hearing, issued an impugned order refusing the grant of patent due to non-compliance of the objections issued in the hearing notice, while denying the second adjournment request.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Copy, Right? ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC

When an artificial intelligence system is trained on copyrighted news content, and later answers a user’s question using what it learned, has the law been broken? On 24th July 2026, the Delhi High Court answered that question, at least for now. In ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. Open AI OpCo LLC, Justice Amit Bansal declined to grant an interim injunction against OpenAI, holding, on a prima facie, interim stage view, that the company’s use of ANI’s news content to train its large language models (“LLMs”) falls within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957
IndiaIntellectual Property
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

AI Training Data, Copyright Risk And Commercial Liability: What Businesses Need To Know

On 8 October 2026, USA Today Co. and its affiliated newspaper companies, which publish 19 titles including USA Today, the Detroit Free Press and The Arizona Republic, sued seven OpenAI entities in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that OpenAI copied their journalism to train its models, stripped identifying information from it, and now uses those models to give ChatGPT users summaries that substitute for the original reporting. The publishers seek more than USD 250 million in damages, an injunction and an order for the destruction of models and training sets containing their content.
IndiaIntellectual Property
Legitpro Law
Legitpro Law