Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 AUGUST 2026

From Libraries To Large Language Models: The New Meaning Of "Research"

The Delhi High Court's landmark ruling in ANI Media v. OpenAI addresses whether training generative AI models on copyrighted content constitutes copyright infringement under Indian law. Through an expansive interpretation of "research" under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957, the Court examines whether a statute enacted decades ago can accommodate modern AI technology and whether commercial entities can claim fair dealing defenses originally framed around private use.

IndiaIntellectual Property

1. Introduction

On 24 July 2026, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court declined to grant ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. (“ANI”) an interim injunction against OpenAI OPCO LLC (“OpenAI”) in ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. v. OpenAI OpCo LLC, 1 making it the first substantial Indian ruling on whether training a generative AI model on copyrighted material infringes copyright. Central to that outcome was the Court's prima facie finding that OpenAI's storage of ANI's news content to train the large language models (“LLMs”) underlying ChatGPT fell within the fair dealing exception under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957. While the judgment addressed several issues, one its most intriguing aspect was the expansive interpretation of “research”, a term introduced in the statute in 1957, to now accommodate a technology that the legislature could not have imagined at that point in time. This article traces and analyses that reasoning.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from