Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MAY 2020

A Satirical Case Or Is There One, Already?

King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Contributor
King, Stubb & Kasiva

King, Stubb & Kasiva

King Stubb & Kasiva is few of the top corporate law firms in India with offices in Bengaluru,...

View firm profile
Explore more from King, Stubb & Kasiva

The Delhi High Court in the matter of Ashutosh Dubey vs Netflix, Inc & Ors . dated May 5, 2020, refused to grant an interim stay on the Netflix's webseries "Hasmukh" against...

IndiaIntellectual Property

The Delhi High Court in the matter of Ashutosh Dubey vs Netflix, Inc & Ors1. dated May 5, 2020, refused to grant an interim stay on the Netflix's webseries "Hasmukh" against the contention of the plaintiff who alleged certain dialogues in the show to be disparaging and highly defamatory to the legal profession, in the eyes of the general public. The court reasoned its order on the ground that the impugned comments did not cause injury to the plaintiff or to a definite group to which the plaintiff belonged. While doing so, the court made some interesting observations on satire as well. This article will take note of the said observations of the Delhi High Court and analyses satire from the perspective of intellectual property laws.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

https://ksandk.com/

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from