Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2021

Defense Acquisition Procedure 2020: Snapshot Of Key Changes

S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices
Contributor
S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices

S&A Law Offices is a full-service law firm headquartered in Delhi NCR. The firm has 300+...

View firm profile
Explore more from S&A Law Offices

The Ministry of Defence frames policies on defence and security-related matters and is responsible for the production of establishments related to the same.

IndiaGovernment, Public Sector
Neeraj Dubey
Neeraj Dubey
Rajveer Agri
Rajveer Agri
Author LinkedIn connections

The Ministry of Defence frames policies on defence and security-related matters and is responsible for the production of establishments related to the same. The first Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP) was promulgated in 2002 and has since been revised periodically to provide impetus to the growing domestic industry and achieve enhanced self-reliance in defence manufacturing. The Main Review Committee under the Chairmanship of DG (Acquisition) Shri Apurva Chandra was constituted in August 2019 for preparation of the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020 (DAP 2020) to suggest changes in the process of capital acquisitions and guidance towards regularising and monitoring indigenous manufacturing and procurement of equipment related to defence sector. DAP 2020 was proposed by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on September 30, 2020 and shall come into effect from October 01, 2020.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

Punjab And Haryana High Court Strikes Down JAO - FAO Retrospective Amendment As Unconstitutional

The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court (HC) in Jyoti Sareen vs. UOI & Others (CWP No. 15791-2024 (O&M)) (Order) held the retrospective amendments carried out vide the Finance Act, 2026, with respect to the powers of the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) to issue a reopening notice under section 148 (Reopening Notice) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (IT Act), as unconstitutional, being violative of the ‘doctrine of separation of powers’ and thus violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
IndiaGovernment, Public Sector
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Article

Acquisition By An FOCC Of An Indian Company: Pricing Conditions For Resident And Non-resident Shareholders

A FOCC refers to an Indian entity that has received foreign investment and is ultimately owned or controlled by persons resident outside India. Although incorporated in India under the Companies Act, such entities are treated differently from domestically owned and controlled Indian companies for the purposes of foreign investment regulation and downstream investment structuring. Consequently, an FOCC, despite being an Indian incorporated entity, is subject to regulatory conditions applicable to foreign investment while undertaking investments into other Indian entities.
IndiaGovernment, Public Sector
LegaLogic
LegaLogic
Article

Understanding Forgery And Use Of A Forged Document

“Commercial disputes being given a criminal colour” is a routine issue faced by criminal courts across the country, and the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has also quashed several criminal complaints pertaining to commercial/civil claims for that reason. It is important to note that, in such criminal complaints, the usual allegations involve offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, forgery, and the use of forged documents.
IndiaCriminal Law
S&A Law Offices
S&A Law Offices