Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 NOVEMBER 2015

Between The Lines - September, 2015

The Bombay High Court held that the intention of both parties was clear that the arbitration shall be either in India or in Singapore.

IndiaCorporate/Commercial Law

I. Bombay High Court decision on arbitration between two Indian parties

The Bombay High Court in the recent case of Addhar Mercantile Private Limited v. Shree Jagdamba Agrico Exports Pvt. Ltd., has considered the issue as to whether two Indian parties choosing a foreign seat of arbitration and a foreign law governing the arbitration agreement may be construed to be contracting out of Indian law.

The parties had entered into an agreement whereby disputes between them were to be referred to arbitration and the arbitration clause included the following language: "Arbitration in India or Singapore and English law to be apply."

When dispute arose between the parties, Addhar filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (the Arbitration Act) for appointment of an arbitrator as well as a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act seeking interim reliefs. Shree Jagadamba opposed both the applications. Application under

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from