Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JULY 2019

Advocate General's Opinion

Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft (Case C-189/18) concerned a case in which the Hungary-based taxpayer contested two decisions of the Hungarian tax authority denying a tax deduction on the basis that the taxpayer...

HungaryTax

Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft (Case C-189/18) concerned a case in which the Hungary-based taxpayer contested two decisions of the Hungarian tax authority denying a tax deduction on the basis that the taxpayer was aware or should have been aware that some of its suppliers were committing tax fraud and had issued fictitious VAT invoices. The Advocate General said that it is for the tax administration to establish – in the light of objective factors and without requiring that taxpayer to carry out checks which are not their responsibility – that the latter knew or should have known that their counterparty was involved in VAT fraud. The fact that certain documents are transferred from one procedure to another does not, per se, result in a breach by the taxable person. However, if a tax authority is relying on such documents, it must: (i) give the taxable person access to the documents it seeks to rely on, not merely a summary, as well as documents which may be favourable

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from