Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2025

Where Does Our Property Stand?

Surely, no-one can dispute that as a matter of fairness, what's mine should be mine and what's ours should be shared. But how does this principle play out in practice?

Hong KongFamily and Matrimonial

Surely, no-one can dispute that as a matter of fairness, what's mine should be mine and what's ours should be shared. But how does this principle play out in practice?

On 2 July 2025, the UKSC handed down its judgment in Standish v. Standish [2025] UKSC 26 offering much-needed clarity on what truly constitutes matrimonial property and the legal consequences of that distinction.

This ruling will undoubtedly shape Hong Kong law, aligning neatly with Step 4 (good reasons for departing from equal sharing) of LKW v. DD (2010) 13 HKCFAR 537, where Ribeiro PJ observed that "[t]he source of an asset may provide a reason for excluding it from the sharing principle on the basis that it is not an item of matrimonial property."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from