Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2025

Quarterly AI Update | Q2 2025

Arnon, Tadmor-Levy
Arnon, Tadmor-Levy
Contributor
Arnon, Tadmor-Levy

Arnon, Tadmor-Levy

With approximately 400 lawyers and interns, including 150 partners, the law firm of Arnon,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnon, Tadmor-Levy

On June 23, 2025, the Northern District Court of California court ruled in favor of Anthropic, in a lawsuit brought by three authors for copyright infringement, alleging the company used their books without permission to train Claude AI.

GlobalTechnology

USA

Court Rules in Favor of Anthropic in AI Training Copyright Case

On June 23, 2025, the Northern District Court of California court ruled in favor of Anthropic, in a lawsuit brought by three authors for copyright infringement, alleging the company used their books without permission to train Claude AI. The court differentiates between the use of pirated books and those legitimately purchased and scanned by Anthropic. While the former would consider to be a violation of copyright laws, the latter may qualify as fair use under the U.S. Copyright Act. For AI training, the judge determined the use was highly transformative since it aimed to create something entirely different rather than replicating the originals. The court noted that Claude's output doesn't infringe on original copyrights and caused no market harm.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from