Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JANUARY 2020

Reflecting On The Google LLC v CNIL (Case C-507/17) ECJ Judgment: A UK And Australian Perspective

In a landmark decision on 24 September 2019 [1], the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") ruled that the 'right to be forgotten' has limited territorial application.

GlobalPrivacy

In a landmark decision on 24 September 2019 1, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("ECJ") ruled that the 'right to be forgotten' has limited territorial application. In particular, when exercised against a controller with multinational or global operations, the right to be forgotten only applies to those operations being undertaken within Member States of the European Union ("EU").

The case was referred to the ECJ by the French Council of State following Google's refusal to pay a €100,000 fine imposed in 2016 by the French data protection regulator, the Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés ("CNIL"). The fine was imposed because Google refused to de-reference (remove) links to search listings, containing personal data which was detrimental to an individual, from Google domains outside of the EU. Google refused despite receiving a formal notice from the CNIL to remove the relevant personal data from all versions of its search engines

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from