Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 AUGUST 2023

Singapore And Hong Kong Courts Maintain High Bars Against Arbitration Case Management Complaints

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

Singapore and Hong Kong remain as two of the most preferred seats for international arbitration in the Asia-Pacific region. According to 2015, 2018 and 2021 rounds of international...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Singapore and Hong Kong remain as two of the most preferred seats for international arbitration in the Asia-Pacific region. According to 2015, 2018 and 2021 rounds of international arbitration surveys conducted by Queen Mary University of London, both jurisdictions are consistently highly rated by users of arbitration, rivalling the likes of London and Paris. This popularity is in no small part due to the pro-arbitration and pro-enforcement reputation of their courts, even in the face of dubious challenges against an award at the enforcement stage.

These include the notorious "due process violations," which often take the form of a party against whom the award is (or will be) invoked alleging a case management irregularity in the underlying arbitration. In this regard, the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, which the Singapore International Arbitration Act 1994 (at s.3(1)) and the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (2014) (at s.4) have largely

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from