Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Arbitrations During The Paris Olympics

Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Contributor
Aceris Law

Aceris Law

Aceris Law is a leading boutique international arbitration law firm. It provides the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Aceris Law

The Paris 2024 Olympics took place from 26 July to 11 August 2024 and were marked not only by remarkable athletic achievements but also by significant arbitration disputes.

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Author LinkedIn connections

The Paris 2024 Olympics took place from 26 July to 11 August 2024 and were marked not only by remarkable athletic achievements but also by significant arbitration disputes. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and its temporary offices played a crucial role in resolving disputes during the Olympic games. The CAS carefully reviewed decisions and secured (at times controversial) justice in the highly competitive environment of the Olympics, involving red cards and spying drones, whether a one-minute inquiry period was respected and 100-gram weight differences.

1507384a.jpg

CAS During the Paris 2024 Olympics

The CAS established two temporary offices in Paris, which operated from 16 July to 11 August 2024, both applying the CAS Ad Hoc Division procedural rules.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Decree 2026-741: France Takes First Step In Modernizing Arbitration Law

France has enacted its first substantive reform of arbitration law since 2011 through Decree No. 2026-741, introducing targeted modernizations to enhance its position as a leading arbitration hub. The amendments introduce a duty of proportionality, expand judicial support powers, establish standalone recognition proceedings, and modernize procedural rules including electronic awards and streamlined challenge procedures. These changes represent the initial phase of a three-stage reform process that will ulti
FranceLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Jones Day
Jones Day
Article

La Contribution Pour La Justice Économique : Ce Qu’il Faut Savoir

Twelve commercial courts in France have been transformed into Economic Activity Tribunals (TAE) as part of a four-year experiment, introducing a mandatory "contribution for economic justice" fee for companies filing claims exceeding €50,000. This new financial charge, validated by the Constitutional Council with important reservations, aims to discourage abusive litigation while encouraging alternative dispute resolution.
FranceLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Delsol Avocats
Delsol Avocats
Article

LD Paris, July 30, 2026, Order Concerning A Preliminary Objection, UPC-CFI-1901/2026

The Paris Local Division of the Unified Patent Court addressed critical jurisdictional questions regarding the interplay between UPC proceedings for provisional measures and parallel national French actions involving supplementary protection certificates. The court examined whether it was "first seized" under Brussels I recast regulations and whether related national proceedings warranted staying the UPC case or declining jurisdiction.
FranceLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article

French Court Of Cassation Limits Enforcement Against State-Linked Assets Where EU Stability Objectives Are At Stake

The French Court of Cassation has established a critical limitation on enforcing arbitral awards against State-linked entities when EU financial stability objectives are at stake. In a landmark ruling involving Greece's asset management vehicle HCAP, the Court held that while creditors may generally pursue assets of State emanations, this doctrine must yield when enforcement would undermine EU-mandated restructuring and stabilization programs. This decision fundamentally reshapes enforcement strategy for ar
FranceLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Behind The Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide To SIAC Arbitration Under The 2025 Rules

The 2025 SIAC Arbitration Rules introduce significant procedural innovations including Streamlined and Expedited Procedures, Preliminary Determination mechanisms, and enhanced Emergency Arbitrator frameworks. Understanding how these rules operate in practice—from initial filing through tribunal constitution, evidence presentation, and final award—is essential for parties navigating SIAC arbitration effectively.
SingaporeLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty To Address The Defence Actually Advanced

The Hong Kong Court of First Instance set aside a USD 481.6 million arbitral award after finding that the tribunal failed to address the actual estoppel defence presented by the respondents. The court distinguished between a tribunal rejecting arguments on their merits versus failing to determine the essential issue actually advanced, emphasizing that tribunals must address the specific case presented rather than a materially different question.
Hong KongLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

A FRANDly Forum? The Growing Role Of Arbitration In SEP Disputes

Standard-essential patent disputes reveal a fundamental tension between territorial patent rights and global technology markets. While patents are enforced nationally, the standards they protect operate across borders, triggering parallel proceedings in multiple jurisdictions. FRAND arbitration offers a potentially coherent alternative by allowing parties to place international SEP portfolios before a single specialist tribunal, though questions of consent, validity, competition law and enforceability compl
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence For Its View On Legal Issues?

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in international arbitration for legal research, document review, and drafting. However, its use becomes difficult to assess when an arbitrator turns to AI not merely to process information, but to obtain a view on a legal issue that the tribunal must decide. This article examines emerging guidance on whether arbitrators can ask AI for its opinion on legal questions and explores the boundaries between AI as a research tool and AI as a decision-maker.
SwitzerlandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Saudi Construction Arbitration In Practice: Claims And Remedies Under The Civil Transactions Law And The Enforcement Of Awards

Saudi Arabia's Civil Transactions Law has transformed construction arbitration by codifying rules on variations, payment, delay, defects and termination. With construction disputes representing 47% of SCCA cases in 2025, understanding how these statutory provisions interact with arbitration procedures and enforcement mechanisms has become essential for parties navigating complex project disputes in the Kingdom.
Saudi ArabiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law