Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2024

The Relationship Between Virtual And Physical Goods And Services

Gün + Partners
Gün + Partners
Contributor
Gün + Partners

Gün + Partners

We are one of the oldest and largest law firms in Turkey and are considered internationally to be...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gün + Partners

The development of NFTs, artificial intelligence, and the metaverse has seen many individuals and legal entities start to include virtual goods and services within the scope of their trademarks.

GlobalIntellectual Property

The development of NFTs, artificial intelligence, and the metaverse has seen many individuals and legal entities start to include virtual goods and services within the scope of their trademarks. Discussions have been widely held about whether virtual goods and services are similar to physical goods and services and under which class these goods and services should be included in the Nice Classification, and the following developments have taken place in this regard.

In a decision issued on March 31, 2023, which was subsequently finalized, following an opposition based on a pre-existing trademark owned by a client company based in the United States, the Trademarks Department of the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office ("the Office") determined that virtual and online goods/services were similar to physical goods/services, and rejected the trademark application pursuant to Article 6/1 of the Industrial Property Code No. 6769 ("IP Code").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from