Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2026

The Trump Administration’s Security-for-Minerals Model Faces Test In The DRC

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

Minimal progress has been achieved towards a permanent settlement of conflict between the DRC and the Rwanda-backed rebel group M23. Fighting in the eastern Congo persists, and both sides continue to accuse...

GlobalGovernment, Public Sector
Chris Dantes
Chris Dantes

Minimal progress has been achieved towards a permanent settlement of conflict between the DRC and the Rwanda-backed rebel group M23. Fighting in the eastern Congo persists, and both sides continue to accuse one another of violating the ceasefire. Perceived US favoritism toward Kinshasa has angered Kigali and M23. Recent US sanctions on former Congolese President Joseph Kabila, who allegedly provides political and financial support to M23, have solidified Rwanda's distrust of the peace framework. Mounting frustration from Rwanda risks derailing the fragile peace process. At the same time, Kinshasa perceives itself as the Trump administration’s preferred regional partner, emboldening President Félix Tshisekedi to prolong conflict and consolidate power. Both Rwanda’s frustration and the DRC’s perceived momentum present substantial obstacles to US policy and demonstrate the potential limitations of the security-for-minerals model. Complex historical grievances and regional ambitions

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from