Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2026

Adapting, Not Altering: Why Nigeria Should Review Its African Charter Act

A UK court ruling in the Bille and Ogale Communities case has exposed critical gaps in Nigeria's African Charter Act, raising questions about whether the 1983 legislation adequately enables human rights claims against private corporations.

GlobalGovernment, Public Sector

Last year, a corporate defendant in the English courts made an argument that should give Nigerian policymakers pause. In Alame & Ors v Shell Plc & Anor [2025] EWHC 1539 (KB), the Bille and Ogale Communities case, Shell’s lawyers argued that the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, as domesticated in Nigeria, imposed obligations principally on the State and did not provide a clear basis for claims against private corporate entities. The King’s Bench Division of the High Court of Justice accepted that position on its assessment of Nigerian law, leaving communities affected by decades of oil pollution in the Niger Delta to face an obstacle rooted not in the Charter itself, but in how a foreign court understood the Nigerian statute through which the Charter operates domestically.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from