Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2021

What Do Recent Regulatory Proposals In Hong Kong Mean For Offshore Virtual Assets Exchanges?

Carey Olsen
Carey Olsen
Contributor
Carey Olsen

Carey Olsen

With a heritage that dates back to 1898, Carey Olsen is one of the most established and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Carey Olsen

2021 has seen significant volatility in the prices of major cryptocurrencies. With such volatility, fortunes have been made and lost, with losses often borne by inexperienced retail clients.

GlobalFinance and Banking

BACKGROUND

2021 has seen significant volatility in the prices of major cryptocurrencies. With such volatility, fortunes have been made and lost, with losses often borne by inexperienced retail clients. It's therefore unsurprising that we have seen increased focus from international regulators in the cryptocurrency space.  

The Cayman Islands was ahead of other jurisdictions in developing a bespoke regulatory framework for the provision of services relating to virtual assets. This was implemented by way of the Virtual Asset (Service Providers) Act (the “VASP Act”) of the Cayman Islands, which became effective from 31 October 2020 (subject to phased implementation).   

In Hong Kong, the Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau published its conclusions paper (the “FSTB Proposals”) on 21 May 2021 following a three month public consultation on a licensing regime for virtual asset services providers. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from