Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2021

SCOTUS Reinstates Guam's CERCLA Action

In Guam v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1608 (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) held that a settlement must specifically resolve CERCLA liability to create a right to contribution.

GlobalEnvironment

In Guam v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1608 (2021), the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) held that a settlement must specifically resolve CERCLA liability to create a right to contribution. The case centered on the Ordot Dump on the island of Guam. The Navy constructed the dump in the 1940s and later turned it over to Guam for use as a landfill. Discharges from the dump triggered an EPA enforcement action under the Clean Water Act which was resolved by a consent decree in 2004.

Thirteen years later, Guam sued the U.S. for the Navy's disposal of hazardous waste at the dump. Guam brought both a cost-recovery action under CERCLA § 107(a), 42 U.S.C. § 9207(a), and a contribution action under § 113(f), 42 U.S.C. § 9213(f). Section 113(f)(3)(B) allows any party that has resolved liability for a “response action” with a state or the U.S. to seek contribution from any party who is not part of the settlement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from