Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 FEBRUARY 2024

Women Underrepresented In Science

Ius Laboris
Explore more from Ius Laboris

To mark UN International Day of Women and girls in Science, on 11 February, we've been taking a look at the issue of gender equality in science as a profession.

GlobalEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris

To mark UN International Day of Women and girls in Science, on 11 February, we've been taking a look at the issue of gender equality in science as a profession. It seems that despite numerous initiatives aimed at promoting gender equality in the workplace, discrimination against women in the field of science continues to be a persistent and systemic issue. From gender bias in the hiring process to unequal pay and limited opportunities for advancement, female scientists face a multitude of challenges that can limit their ability to succeed in the field.

Women's Presence in Science

While the number of scientists per million inhabitants in the world increased to 1352.5 in 2021 from 1143.1 in 2015 (UNESCO IUS.Stat), numerous studies reveal persistent underrepresentation of women in many fields of science. The latest OECD International Survey of Scientific Authors (ISSA2) found that only about 40% of all scientists across OECD nations are women, with Luxembourg having

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Mandatory Registration Of Working Time As Of 2027: The Clock Is Ticking

Belgium is set to implement mandatory working time registration by January 2027, following a 2019 European Court of Justice ruling that requires EU Member States to establish objective and reliable systems for measuring employee working hours. A draft bill has been submitted to the National Labour Council, outlining requirements for employers across all sectors while providing specific exemptions for certain employee categories and offering flexibility in implementation methods.
BelgiumEmployment and HR
ALTIUS
ALTIUS
Article

Workplace AI In APAC: Regulation And The Direction Of Travel

Artificial intelligence is transforming workforce management across Asia-Pacific, yet most jurisdictions rely on existing employment and data protection laws rather than AI-specific legislation. Governments supplement these frameworks with ethical principles and voluntary guidance, though recent developments in Australia and Malaysia suggest a shift toward more targeted oversight of AI systems that significantly impact workers.
GlobalEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris
Article

EU Pay Transparency Directive: Which Countries Have Transposed?

The EU Pay Transparency Directive mandates that employers with over 100 workers regularly report detailed gender pay gap information, with strict timelines to address disparities of 5% or more. The Directive also grants employees and job candidates significant pay transparency rights, including access to salary ranges and comparative pay data. This interactive map tracks the transposition status of the Directive across European Member States as the June 2026 deadline approaches.
European UnionEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris
Article

EU Pay Transparency Transposition: Belgium Implements Public Sector Portion, Private Sector Still To Come

Belgium has partially implemented the EU Pay Transparency Directive for its public sector, but private-sector employers await comprehensive federal legislation. While the transposition timeline remains uncertain, the Directive provides a clear framework for anticipated requirements including recruitment transparency, objective pay structures, employee information rights, and gender pay gap reporting that employers should begin preparing for now.
European UnionEmployment and HR
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Article

Youth In The Digital Age: Challenges And Opportunities

As digital transformation accelerates and AI reshapes the workplace, young workers face mounting challenges in acquiring relevant skills and securing entry-level positions. This analysis examines how technological evolution, remote work dynamics, and AI-driven recruitment are creating new barriers for youth employment, while highlighting innovative government initiatives across Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific that are helping bridge the digital skills gap.
BelgiumEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris
Article

Getting Restructuring Right In Australia And New Zealand: FAQs For Employers

Employers planning workforce reductions in Australia and New Zealand face distinct legal frameworks that require careful navigation. While both jurisdictions mandate genuine business reasons and employee consultation, critical differences in timing, process requirements, and redeployment obligations can significantly impact restructuring outcomes. Understanding these nuances is essential for organizations managing cross-border redundancy programs to minimize legal risk and operational disruption.
GlobalEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris
Article

AI Regulation In The US: The New State Laws Employers Can’t Ignore

As US state legislatures conclude their 2026 sessions, artificial intelligence regulation has transitioned from an emerging policy area to a mainstream compliance obligation. This comprehensive analysis examines the patchwork of enacted AI legislation across consumer transparency, healthcare, and employment sectors, revealing what businesses operating across state lines must prioritize in the second half of the year.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris
Article

The world court has spoken: What the ICJ’s ‘Right to Strike’ opinion means for Australian employers

The International Court of Justice has issued a landmark advisory opinion confirming that the right to strike is protected under ILO Convention No. 87, a treaty Australia ratified in 1973. While this opinion doesn't immediately change Australian domestic law, it creates a significant new reference point that unions may leverage in litigation, enterprise bargaining, and industrial relations reform discussions. Australian employers face potential challenges to existing Fair Work Act restrictions on protected
AustraliaEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris