Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2020

Reflections On Loss

In Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 (15 July 2020), the UK Supreme Court unanimously confirmed that the rule barring recovery of "reflective loss" does not and cannot apply to creditor claims.

GlobalCorporate/Commercial Law

In Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 (15 July 2020), the UK Supreme Court unanimously confirmed that the rule barring recovery of "reflective loss" does not and cannot apply to creditor claims.

Marex Financial Ltd ("Marex"), a creditor of two companies incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (the "BVI companies"), had brought a claim against Mr Sevilleja alleging that he had caused loss to the BVI companies, thereby preventing the BVI companies from satisfying a judgment debt in favour of Marex. Mr Sevilleja sought to argue that Marex's loss was merely reflective of the loss sustained by the BVI companies, and that Marex's claim was therefore unsustainable by reason of the rule barring recovery of such loss. The UK Supreme Court rejected Mr Sevilleja's argument, thereby allowing Marex's claim to proceed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from