Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 DECEMBER 2019

Effectiveness Of Anti-Bartlett Clauses Confirmed

Collas Crill
Collas Crill
Contributor
Collas Crill

Collas Crill

Firm Details: Chief Executive Officer: Jason Romer Managing Partners: Bermuda: Lilla Zuill, BVI:...

View firm profile
Explore more from Collas Crill

The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal has delivered its highly anticipated judgment, overturning the earlier judgments and confirming that trustees may continue to rely...

GlobalCorporate/Commercial Law

The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal has delivered its highly anticipated judgment, overturning the earlier judgments and confirming that trustees may continue to rely upon provisions commonly known as 'anti-Bartlett' clauses in trust instruments, which seek to negate a trustee's duty to enquire into or interfere in the management of underlying companies within a trust structure when an investment manager is appointed.

Facts

In our October 2019 article here, we touched upon the facts of ZHANG HONG LI AND ANOTHER V DBS (HONG KONG) LTD AND OTHERS [2018] HKCA 435 and addressed the reasons why the Hong Kong Court of Appeal's judgment was unlikely to affect VISTA or STAR trusts. On 22 November 20191, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (Court of Final Appeal) overturned the Court of Appeal's judgment, removing all doubt about the ongoing relevance of anti-Bartlett clauses and the limited duty owed by a trustee in those circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from