Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2026

Ancillary Restraints Under The COMESA Merger Control Regime

The COMESA Competition Regulations 2025 introduce express recognition of ancillary restraints in merger control assessment, marking a significant shift in how transaction-related restrictions are evaluated. This development raises important questions about the scope and application of the ancillary restraints doctrine within the COMESA merger control framework, particularly regarding non-compete and non-solicitation clauses.

GlobalAntitrust/Competition Law

The “ancillary restraints” doctrine, originally developed by the European Commission, serves to validate restraints that are objectively necessary to implement a legitimate transaction. It is relevant to restrictions that are directly related to, and necessary for, the implementation of a concentration. The treatment of ancillary restraints in merger control varies significantly across competition law regimes. While some jurisdictions have adopted dedicated frameworks setting out the conditions under which transaction-related restrictions may be considered permissible, others address such restrictions as part of the broader substantive assessment of a concentration. The COMESA Competition and Consumer Commission (CCCC) has historically not recognised a standalone ancillary restraints doctrine. However, the recently adopted COMESA Competition Regulations 2025 expressly recognise ancillary restrictions as a factor that may be considered in merger assessment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from