Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2014

Real Estate – Recent Developments And Decisions - Autumn 2014

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The termination of a lease agreement by the acquirer for the reason of non-compliance with written form requirement is permissible despite existence of a remedial written form clause.

GermanyReal Estate and Construction

Keywords: real estate, termination, lease agreement

The termination of a lease agreement by the acquirer for the reason of non-compliance with written form requirement is permissible despite existence of a remedial written form clause.

BGH [Federal Supreme Court], judgment of January 22, 2014 – XII ZR 68/10 and BGH, judgment of April 30, 2014 – XII ZR [civil law] 146 /12

By Dr. Jörg Michael Lang

Guiding principle

1. BGH XII ZR 68/10 of January 22, 2014 A so-called remedial written form clause in the lease agreement does not in itself prevent the acquirer from terminating a lease agreement which he entered into pursuant to Section 566 Para 1 BGB by citing lack of the requirement of the written form, without first requiring the tenant to remedy the deficiency.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from