Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2026

The Insolvency Administrator's Long Memory – When Gratuitous Benefits Are Reclaimed

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under German insolvency law, gratuitous transfers made within four years of insolvency filing can be clawed back by administrators without proving bad faith. This creates substantial exposure for shareholders, directors, and their relatives who received company assets, distributions, or benefits during this period. Understanding the prerequisites for avoidance under section 134 InsO and implementing protective measures is essential for corporate stakeholders.

GermanyInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

I. WHY THIS TOPIC IS IMPORTANT

When someone receives a gift, the recipient rarely considers the possibility of the donor’s insolvency. Yet, this is precisely where a significant claw-back risk arises: Under section 134 of the German Insolvency Code (Insolvenzordnung, InsO), the insolvency administrator may challenge gratuitous transfers made by the debtor within the four years preceding the filing of the insolvency petition—without having to prove that the recipient acted in bad faith or was aware of the debtor’s financial distress.

In practice, this primarily affects shareholders, managing directors, and their relatives who have received assets from a company that later became insolvent. Because the four-year challenge period also covers transactions carried out long before the onset of financial difficulty, the risk exposure for recipients is substantial.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2026. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from