Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2015

US Data Transfers Post-Schrems – 4 Points To Note From EU Regulators' Statement

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Contributor
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Managing Partner: Will Carmody Chair: Philip Nolan Number of partners: 124 Languages: French,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

The Article 29 Working Party ("WP29") – the collective body all of EU data protection regulators ("DPAs") – has published a statement in reaction to the recent Schrems judgment.

European UnionPrivacy

The Article 29 Working Party (“WP29”) – the collective body all of EU data protection regulators (“DPAs”) – has published a statement in reaction to the recent Schrems judgment. With Schrems triggering the end of the EU-US Safe Harbor arrangement, WP29 has called on DPAs to inform stakeholders and assist companies with on-going compliance.

The WP29 has confirmed that both the European Commission Standard Contractual Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules remain valid methods to transfer data to the US. However, DPAs may commence concerted investigation and enforcement in early 2016. We take a look at 4 points to note from this statement.

1. Implementing the judgment

WP29 has reiterated the need for EU DPAs to have a “robust, collective and common position” to successfully implement the Schrems judgment. The statement adopts the position that the core element to the Schrems decision was the issue of massive and indiscriminate surveillance – something WP29 has previ

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from