Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2015

Safe Harbor Submerged: What Next?

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP
Contributor
Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Managing Partner: Will Carmody Chair: Philip Nolan Number of partners: 124 Languages: French,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mason Hayes & Curran LLP

Due to a gap in EU legislation, EU based data processors cannot clearly rely on SCCs to justify data export.

European UnionPrivacy

As has been well reported, earlier today the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") handed down its long awaited judgment in Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner (C-362/14).

The Court found that the Safe Harbor system facilitating the export of personal data from the EU to the USA is 'invalid'. But what does this mean for international business, and what are the next steps?

1. The judgment is less restrictive for businesses than the AG's opinion

The judgment doesn't go quite as far as the Advocate General Bot's Opinion of 23 September 2015, which, as we flagged in our previous post, went so far as to suggest that EU Commission Decisions approving international data transfers were not binding on national data protection authorities ("DPAs"). As we previously noted, the AG's position was quite problematic from the perspective of legal certainty and inconsistent with basic principles of EU law. The fact that the Court has not followed this aspect

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from