Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 SEPTEMBER 2023

Arbitration Update: Anti-Suit Injunctions And The Relationship With The Seat Of Arbitration

Milbank
Milbank
Contributor
Milbank

Milbank

Milbank has been in London for over 40 years, assisting clients with their most complex,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Milbank

In a judgment issued last week in the anonymised case of SQD v QYP [2023] EWHC 2145, the Commercial Court provided some helpful guidance on the relevant considerations...

European UnionLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a judgment issued last week in the anonymised case of SQD v QYP [2023] EWHC 2145, the Commercial Court provided some helpful guidance on the relevant considerations under English law for seeking an antisuit injunction to restrain proceedings that are commenced in breach of an arbitration agreement. The judgment highlighted in particular the important relationship between the seat of arbitration and the national courts' ability to grant anti-suit injunctions and emphasises a major difference between the respective French and English law approaches that may have a material impact on the decision for parties as to the most appropriate seat to include in their arbitration agreements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from