Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2023

Social Security And Cross-Border Telework: Which Rules Apply? (Video)

Ius Laboris
Explore more from Ius Laboris

Though pandemic-era exceptions to EU social security rules have now expired, cross-border telework seems here to stay. In this episode of our 'Coffee Break' series, Amy Nevins of Ius Laboris's UK firm...

European UnionLaw Practice Management
Amy Nevins (Lewis Silkin LLP)
Amy Nevins (Lewis Silkin LLP)
Sophie Maes (Claeys & Engels)
Sophie Maes (Claeys & Engels)

self

Though pandemic-era exceptions to EU social security rules have now expired, cross-border telework seems here to stay. In this episode of our 'Coffee Break' series, Amy Nevins of Ius Laboris's UK firm sits down with Sophie Maes of Ius Laboris Belgium to discuss a new Framework Agreement that will allow some cross-border teleworkers to work from their country of residence up to 50% of the time without any change in the applicable social security law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

AI-Assisted Grievances: A New Challenge For Employers?

Employees are increasingly using AI to draft workplace grievances, creating lengthy, legalistic complaints that can obscure simple concerns. While AI can help structure complaints and improve accessibility, it also risks escalating conflicts, introducing data protection issues, and making resolution harder. HR teams must now balance fair treatment of AI-assisted grievances with practical, proportionate responses that focus on the real issues rather than managing overly complex documents.
United KingdomLaw Practice Management
B P Collins LLP
B P Collins LLP
Article

The world court has spoken: What the ICJ’s ‘Right to Strike’ opinion means for Australian employers

The International Court of Justice has issued a landmark advisory opinion confirming that the right to strike is protected under ILO Convention No. 87, a treaty Australia ratified in 1973. While this opinion doesn't immediately change Australian domestic law, it creates a significant new reference point that unions may leverage in litigation, enterprise bargaining, and industrial relations reform discussions. Australian employers face potential challenges to existing Fair Work Act restrictions on protected
AustraliaEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris
Article

AI Regulation In The US: The New State Laws Employers Can’t Ignore

As US state legislatures conclude their 2026 sessions, artificial intelligence regulation has transitioned from an emerging policy area to a mainstream compliance obligation. This comprehensive analysis examines the patchwork of enacted AI legislation across consumer transparency, healthcare, and employment sectors, revealing what businesses operating across state lines must prioritize in the second half of the year.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris
Article

Japan’s Pension System: What Employers Need To Know

Japan's public pension system requires mandatory enrollment for all residents aged 20 to under 60, including foreign nationals, with contributions split equally between employers and employees. While supplementary corporate pension plans are voluntary, employers must navigate strict legal requirements when establishing or amending them. Understanding the interplay between statutory obligations, voluntary pension options, and the tax treatment of contributions and benefits is essential for compliant workforc
JapanEmployment and HR
Ius Laboris
Ius Laboris