Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2018

Advocate General Issues SPC Opinion In Teva V Gilead

Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mishcon de Reya LLP
Contributor
Mishcon de Reya LLP

Mishcon de Reya LLP

Founded by Lord Mishcon in 1937, in a one-room office in Brixton, Mishcon de Reya now employs over...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mishcon de Reya LLP

On 25 April, Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion on the interpretation of Article 3(a) SPC Regulation in the referral from the UK Patents Court in Teva & ors v Gilead ...

European UnionIntellectual Property

On 25 April, Advocate General Wathelet issued his opinion on the interpretation of Article 3(a) SPC Regulation in the referral from the UK Patents Court in Teva & ors v Gilead following a hearing before the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU in February 2018. The Advocate General's opinion is that a product will be protected by a basic patent if, at the priority date, it would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art that the active ingredient in question was 'specifically and precisely identifiable' in the wording of the claims of the basic patent. In the case of a combination of active ingredients, each active ingredient in that combination must be 'specifically, precisely and individually identifiable' in the wording of the claims of the basic patent. No date has yet been given for the decision of the CJEU itself, but we will report on this in due course.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from