Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2015

The Definition Of Commodity Derivatives Under MiFID: ESMA Issues Final Guidelines

GVZH Advocates
GVZH Advocates
Contributor
GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates is a modern and sophisticated legal practice comprised of top-tier professionals,...

View firm profile
Explore more from GVZH Advocates

On the 6th May 2015, ESMA issued guidelines with a view to creating one consistent application of the definitions of commodity derivatives under MiFID, prior to the implementation of MiFID II in January 2017.

European UnionFinance and Banking

On the 6th May 2015, ESMA issued guidelines with a view to creating one consistent application of the definitions of commodity derivatives under MiFID, prior to the implementation of MiFID II in January 2017.

At present there is no such uniform application of definitions of derivatives in the EU, particularly so with respect to physically settled commodity forwards. As a result of such lack of uniformity, the application of EMIR is inconsistent, as it makes reference to the MiFID commodity derivatives definition, which is currently applied differently by each Member State.

The Guidelines attempt to define the meaning of "physically settled" and confirm that MiFID covers forwards traded on a regulated market or multilateral trading facility.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from