Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JUNE 2017

Significant Cartel Developments At EU Level In April/May 2017

Van Bael & Bellis
Van Bael & Bellis
Contributor
Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis

Van Bael & Bellis is a leading independent law firm headquartered in Brussels with offices in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Van Bael & Bellis

In addition, the ECJ confirmed that Pacific Fruit's conduct restricted competition by object.

European UnionAntitrust/Competition Law

In this article, we give a factual overview of significant case developments at EU level in April/May 2017, and then provide a more detailed analysis of important substantive or procedural developments addressed in these cases.

Summary of Significant Case Developments

Advocate General Tanchev recommends upholding judgment in Gas Insulated Switchgear cartel case

On 26 April 2017, Advocate General Tanchev delivered an opinion in which he recommended upholding a General Court ("GC") judgment, which dismissed the claims brought by Toshiba and Mitsubishi Electric against the re-imposition of fines amounting to approximately € 36 million. These fines were re-imposed by the European Commission for the companies' participation in the Gas Insulated Switchgear cartel case (See VBB on Competition Law, Volume 2016, No. 1, available at www.vbb.com) (Case C-180/16, Toshiba v Commission).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from