Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 MAY 2005

Probity in Ecuadorian Justice

The Second Chamber of District Administrative Litigation Court No. 1 issued judgment on March 1, 2005, acknowledging BAT’s right to register (use?) its BELMONT trademark in Ecuador.  In an action that began in 1997, partner Jose Rafael Bustamante led a team of Bustamante & Bustamante litigators that played a decisive role in convincing the Court to overcome the opposition filed by BAT rival Phillip Morris.

EcuadorIntellectual Property
Amani Harrison Esq
Amani Harrison Esq

Bustamante & Bustamante help British American Tabacco Company Limited (BAT) establish trademark priority rights; ends 8-year battle against competitor Phillip Morris.

The Second Chamber of District Administrative Litigation Court No. 1 issued judgment on March 1, 2005, acknowledging BAT’s right to register (use?) its BELMONT trademark in Ecuador.  In an action that began in 1997, partner Jose Rafael Bustamante led a team of Bustamante & Bustamante litigators that played a decisive role in convincing the Court to overcome the opposition filed by BAT rival Phillip Morris.

At issue was whether Phillip Morris could maintain its registration of the Belmont trademark in Ecuador in order to prevent BAT from entering that market even though BAT possessed the more senior registration by its filing in Venezuela ten years earlier.  Bustamante & Bustamante argued that the fifth transitory provision of Decision 313 issued by the Cartagena Agreement Commission governed the issue.  The Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from