Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MAY 2026

Disable AI Guardrails? Not Without First Checking The Chain Of Title (CoT).

As generative AI scales, enterprise clients and creators are increasingly asking tech providers to lift intellectual property, face, and voice guardrails. But under Danish law, supported by EU law and practice, when does a platform’s passive infrastructure position become a high-risk enabling role?

DenmarkTechnology

As generative AI scales, enterprise clients and creators are increasingly asking tech providers to lift intellectual property, face, and voice guardrails.

But under Danish law, supported by EU law and practice, when does a platform’s passive infrastructure position become a high-risk enabling role?

Let’s break down the standard of reasonable professional care into a risk-based framework:

High Risk (Substantive Review Required): Knowingly disabling guardrails for globally known celebrities, realistic voice cloning, commercial music, or famous film/TV franchises. A basic contractual warranty or clickwrap confirmation is not an absolute legal shield if obvious red flags are present.

Moderate Risk (Formal + Targeted Review): Licensed third-party IP or account-level whitelisting for enterprise clients – e.g. an agency using a licensed cartoon character for campaign drafts. This requires verifying scope, duration, and territory limits to ensure older agreements actually cover synthetic

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from