Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 OCTOBER 2026

Liability For Fire Safety Requirements: Who Bears The Risk When The Fire Strategy Cannot Be Implemented?

Plesner
Plesner
Contributor
Plesner

Plesner

Greenland desk: Plesner's Greenland team based in Copenhagen has been notably active in Greenland...

View firm profile
Explore more from Plesner

A fire strategy is typically established at an early stage of a construction project, but its underlying assumptions are tested only once the relevant solutions are finally designed and implemented.

DenmarkLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A fire strategy is typically established at an early stage of a construction project, but its underlying assumptions are tested only once the relevant solutions are finally designed and implemented. This applies especially to renovation and extension projects, where new fire safety solutions must operate in conjunction with an existing building. Where an assumption proves unfounded, the consequences may include redesign, additional works and delay.

Liability for the resulting costs depends on the reason for the change and on the terms agreed between the parties. Was the necessary solution already comprised within the contractor's scope of works? Has a consultant or contractor committed a design error? Or does the matter concern a new requirement, or a condition of the existing building, that the agreement did not address? These questions must be considered separately in determining liability and the allocation of costs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from