Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 AUGUST 2016

The Chilean Antitrust Court Rejected A Complaint Against Masisa

Carey
Carey
Contributor
Carey

Carey

Carey is Chile’s largest law firm, with more than 280 legal professionals providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Carey

Chile's Competition Tribunal announced last Wednesday that it has rejected a predatory pricing complaint against two furniture manufacturers, as the companies lack a high enough market share to be...

ChileAntitrust/Competition Law
Originally Published By Latin Lawyer
Originally Published By Latin Lawyer

Chile's Competition Tribunal announced last Wednesday that it has rejected a predatory pricing complaint against two furniture manufacturers, as the companies lack a high enough market share to be considered dominant.

Furniture company Metalurgica Silcosil made the complaint to the specialist tribunal, which is a division of Chile's competition watchdog, against rivals Masisa and Masisa Componentes. The two companies respectively manufacture ready to assemble furniture and wooden furniture components.

In its March 2015 complaint, Silcosil claimed the two Masisa companies had engaged in predatory pricing and margin squeezing, and copied Silcosil's intellectual property. Silcosil said the behaviour took place across Chile and had had significant effects on both its business and consumers throughout the country.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from