Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2016

Notification Injunctions - A New Tool For Asset Preservation?

Appleby
Appleby
Contributor
Appleby

Appleby

Appleby is a leading offshore law firm. The team of legal specialists advise global public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Appleby

When plaintiffs sue for substantial damages they need to be confident that the defendant has assets to meet a judgment.

Cayman IslandsWealth Management

When plaintiffs sue for substantial damages they need to be confident that the defendant has assets to meet a judgment. That does not just mean knowing that the defendant presently has assets, it means being confident that the defendant won't re-arrange their affairs when sued to put assets beyond reach of execution of judgment. Where there is real risk that assets will be dissipated to defeat judgment a plaintiff has the option of seeking an order freezing assets pending the outcome of the law suit. That, however, is an intrusive remedy that requires good evidence of a risk of dissipation and requires the plaintiff to able to give a credible cross-undertaking (often backed by security) to make good any losses the order may cause. There are cases where an order cannot be obtained even though there is a genuine concern about dissipation because the plaintiff cannot produce sufficient evidence to satisfy the test applied by the court for proving that the risk is "real".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from