Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 OCTOBER 2019

The Cost Consequences Of Not Expressly Marking Correspondence "Without Prejudice"

The English High Court ("Court") has found that an arbitrator could consider a letter containing an offer of settlement but not expressly marked "Without prejudice"...

Cayman IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The English High Court ("Court") has found that an arbitrator could consider a letter containing an offer of settlement but not expressly marked "Without prejudice" on the subject of costs. The issue raised in Sternberg Reed Solicitors v Harrison [2019] EWHC 2065 (Ch) ("Sternberg") had apparently never been raised before and the decision seems at odds with the usual application of the "Without prejudice" rule. Leave to appeal was refused. The decision would be considered persuasive authority in other common law jurisdictions, such as the Cayman Islands and is not likely to be considered limited to arbitration but to apply in Court proceedings also.

What is "Without prejudice" rule?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from