Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MARCH 2024

No Place For Public Policy - Cayman Islands Reviews Forum Formula

The Court recognised that its primary task is to identify the forum in which the case can be suitably tried for the interests of all parties and for the ends of justice.

Cayman IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent decision of Taiping Trustees Limited v Valley Stone Industry Fund Ltd, the Cayman Islands Grand Court provided a timely reminder that public policy factors should not be taken into account when determining the appropriate forum for a dispute.

The Court recognised that its primary task is to identify the forum in which the case can be suitably tried for the interests of all parties and for the ends of justice. The "natural" or appropriate forum is that which the case has the most real and substantial connection. In doing so, the Court must consider and weigh up the connecting factors (or, the Spiliada principles) to determine where the balance lies.

One argument raised was whether it would be appropriate for policy reasons for all disputes relating to fiduciaries of Cayman Islands investment vehicles to be determined in the Cayman Islands. In considering the principles applicable to forum non conveniens, Justice Doyle reviewed a number of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from