Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2015

A Level Playing Field: Security for Costs Applications in Winding Up Proceedings

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

The Court of Appeal has recently clarified that if a foreign company, being a shareholder of a Cayman Islands company, ..

Cayman IslandsInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The Court of Appeal has recently clarified that if a foreign company, being a shareholder of a Cayman Islands company, issues a winding up petition against that company and there is evidence that the petitioning company will be unable to pay an adverse costs order if the respondent is successful at trial, then the Cayman Islands court has an inherent jurisdiction to order the petitioning foreign company to provide security for the respondent's costs – Re Dyxnet Holdings1.  Foreign company petitioners are now in the same position as Cayman Islands petitioners. 

The Statutory Reforms in 2009

The Court of Appeal began its analysis by considering the effect of the statutory reforms in 2009 to the laws and court rules relating to the winding up of Cayman Islands companies2.  Prior to those reforms, if an (allegedly) impecunious shareholder presented a winding up petition the court had the power to order the petitioning company to pay security for the respondent's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from