Where a company's liquidation is necessary, deciding who or
where is best placed to administer an orderly wind down for the
benefit of creditors can be difficult: the shortfall of assets in
an insolvency will highlight jurisdictional differences in approach
as to questions of priority, frequently territorial rather than
universalist.
However, certain restructuring processes have by necessity been
forged under the banner of a liquidation process1, in
which case the appropriateness of a particular jurisdiction's
primacy can be in danger of distortion. A tension can certainly
arise if a debtor company espouses the possibility of a
restructuring for which it needs negotiation breathing space; but
creditors prefer a winding up before further asset erosion and/or
to investigate matters leading to the company's present
predicament: where that division is evident across two different
jurisdictions the issue is underscored.